tool: have have used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have have used 1.00
be used 0.89
have 0.89
is used for 0.86
being is used 0.83
is used more 0.83
is is used 0.83
were used build 0.82
be used making 0.78
is least used 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(method, is least used)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(method, is least used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(method, is least used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is used for)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(calculator, have)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(method, is least used)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be used)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(calculator, have)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(calculator, have)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is used for)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is used for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tool, have have used)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, being is used)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tool, is used for)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tool, being is used)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tool, is is used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, is least used)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be used)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(calculator, have)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is used for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, is least used)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)