alliance: be bad

Related concepts

Parents	partnership Weight: 0.65 , organization Weight: 0.64 , third party Weight: 0.62 , pact Weight: 0.59 , society Weight: 0.59
Siblings	agreement Weight: 0.35 , democratic party Weight: 0.33 , ally Weight: 0.33 , political party Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad	1.00
do bad	0.92
has quality bad	0.86
suck bad in ashran	0.85
suck bad in ashran for events	0.82
has quality good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(pact, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(alliance, be bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(pact, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(alliance, be bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(alliance, be bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(pact, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(pact, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ally, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(pact, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(alliance, be bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(pact, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(alliance, be bad)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(alliance, be bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(ally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(ally, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(alliance, be bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(alliance, do bad)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(alliance, do bad)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(alliance, do bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(alliance, do bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(alliance, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(alliance, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(alliance, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(alliance, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(alliance, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(alliance, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(alliance, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(alliance, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(alliance, be bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(pact, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(pact, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(ally, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(pact, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(alliance, be bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(pact, has quality good)