partnership: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, relationship
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, commitment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.33
, merger
Weight: 0.33
, acquisition
Weight: 0.33
, pact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
is good leadership quality 0.84
is good value 0.81
has quality price 0.80
be good for business 0.80
has quality news 0.79
be good in business 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(commitment, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relationship, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(relationship, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relationship, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good value)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(friendship, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relationship, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(commitment, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(friendship, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(friendship, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pact, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pact, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(merger, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pact, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pact, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(merger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality news)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(partnership, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(partnership, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(partnership, be good in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(partnership, be good for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partnership, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(relationship, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(commitment, is good value)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(friendship, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pact, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pact, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, has quality news)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(merger, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(merger, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(relationship, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(commitment, is good value)