commitment: is good leadership quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, term
Weight: 0.62
, pledge
Weight: 0.61
Siblings new job
Weight: 0.64
, contribution
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, promise
Weight: 0.58
, partnership
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good leadership quality 1.00
is leadership quality 0.98
be important for leadership 0.93
be important in leadership 0.93
has quality good 0.84
has quality better 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
be good for business 0.76
be good in business 0.76
has quality system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(quality, be important for leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pledge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pledge, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(quality, be important for leadership)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pledge, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important for leadership)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(contribution, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(quality, be important for leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pledge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(partnership, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(contribution, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contribution, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(partnership, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good for business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(appointment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(appointment, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(commitment, is good leadership quality)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important in leadership)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(commitment, be important in leadership)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in leadership)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important in leadership)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(commitment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pledge, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quality, be important for leadership)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(contribution, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partnership, be good for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(appointment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pledge, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quality, be important for leadership)