commitment: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, term
Weight: 0.62
, pledge
Weight: 0.61
Siblings new job
Weight: 0.64
, contribution
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, promise
Weight: 0.58
, partnership
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good leadership quality 0.84
has quality system 0.84
is good value 0.81
be good for business 0.80
be good in business 0.79
be better than quantity 0.77
is leadership quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pledge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pledge, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pledge, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(contribution, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pledge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(partnership, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(contribution, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contribution, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(appointment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(appointment, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(partnership, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(commitment, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(commitment, is good value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(commitment, is leadership quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commitment, is good leadership quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good value)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(commitment, is good value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pledge, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(contribution, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partnership, be good for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(appointment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pledge, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)