partnership: be good in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, relationship
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, commitment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.33
, merger
Weight: 0.33
, acquisition
Weight: 0.33
, pact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in business 1.00
be good for business 0.99
be better for business 0.94
be important in business 0.93
build important in business 0.86
be for businesses 0.81
be important in business transactions 0.81
has quality good 0.79
is good value 0.79
go good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(commitment, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(commitment, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(commitment, is good value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(commitment, is good value)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important in business transactions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(friendship, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(commitment, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(commitment, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(contract, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(friendship, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(friendship, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(contract, be important in business transactions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contract, be important in business transactions)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pact, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pact, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(merger, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(partnership, be good in business)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(partnership, be good for business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good for business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(partnership, be better for business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(partnership, be important in business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(partnership, be important in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(partnership, be important in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partnership, be good for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partnership, be better for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(partnership, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(commitment, is good value)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(friendship, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(contract, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pact, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(contract, be important in business transactions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(merger, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(commitment, is good value)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)