partnership: be better for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, relationship
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, commitment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.33
, merger
Weight: 0.33
, acquisition
Weight: 0.33
, pact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for business 1.00
be good for business 0.95
be good in business 0.94
be important in business 0.89
build important in business 0.83
has quality better 0.82
be better than corporation 0.82
be better than love 0.81
be for businesses 0.80
be better than ones 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partnership, be better for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partnership, be better for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(commitment, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partnership, be better for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be better than love)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(commitment, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(partnership, be better for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(contract, be important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(friendship, be better than love)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(friendship, be better than love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(partnership, be better for business)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(partnership, be good in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(partnership, be good for business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(partnership, be important in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(partnership, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partnership, be good for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(partnership, be important in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(partnership, be better than corporation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(partnership, be better than corporation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(partnership, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(partnership, be better than corporation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better than corporation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partnership, be better for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(contract, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(friendship, be better than love)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(partnership, be better for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)