alpaca: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
has quality cost 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alpaca, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alpaca, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(alpaca, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alpaca, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(alpaca, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)