alpaca: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
has quality good 0.82
is expensive 0.77
has quality noise 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(alpaca, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alpaca, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alpaca, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)