meat: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
get expensive 0.94
is expensive nowadays 0.91
get more expensive 0.90
is cheaper 0.85
is inefficient cheap 0.82
is inefficient yet cheap 0.81
be expensive in switzerland 0.80
is cheap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fast food, get expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheap)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(meat, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(meat, is more expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)