fast food: is cheaper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheaper 1.00
be cheaper than food 0.92
be cheaper than healthy food 0.87
be cheaper than vegetables 0.86
is expensive 0.85
is expensive now 0.83
is cheap 0.83
get expensive 0.83
is inexpensive 0.80
is more convenient 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is cheap)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pizza, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pizza, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pizza, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pizza, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheaper)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fast food, get expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheap)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fast food, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fast food, is expensive now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fast food, get expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is more convenient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, is more convenient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive now)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fast food, is more convenient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fast food, is more convenient)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, is cheap)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)