junk food: be cheaper than food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than food 1.00
be cheaper than healthy food 0.95
be cheaper than fresh food 0.94
be cheaper than vegetables 0.90
be better than food 0.90
be cheaper than fruits 0.88
is less expensive 0.85
be better than healthy food 0.84
is food 0.80
is expensive 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stuff, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food, is food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, is less expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, is food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(junk food, is food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)