fast food: be cheaper than vegetables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than vegetables 1.00
be cheaper than food 0.90
be cheaper than healthy food 0.88
is cheaper 0.86
be better than home cooked 0.78
be cheap compared to cooking at home 0.78
be cheap compared to cooking 0.77
get expensive 0.77
be better than home 0.76
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pizza, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pizza, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fast food, get expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fast food, get expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fast food, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)