fast food: be cheaper than food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than food 1.00
be cheaper than healthy food 0.95
is cheaper 0.92
be cheaper than vegetables 0.90
be worse than restaurant food 0.82
is food 0.80
is expensive 0.80
get expensive 0.80
is expensive now 0.80
be cheap compared to cooking 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(junk food, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, is food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(junk food, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(pizza, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pizza, is food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pizza, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pizza, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fast food, get expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food, is food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fast food, is food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fast food, is expensive now)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fast food, get expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fast food, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive now)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pizza, is food)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)