junk food: be cheaper than vegetables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than vegetables 1.00
be cheaper than fruits 0.91
be cheaper than food 0.90
be cheaper than fresh food 0.89
be cheaper than healthy food 0.88
be better than food 0.81
is less expensive 0.79
be better than healthy food 0.79
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stuff, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, is less expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)