junk food: be cheaper than fresh food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than fresh food 1.00
be cheaper than food 0.94
be cheaper than healthy food 0.93
be cheaper than vegetables 0.89
be better than food 0.87
be cheaper than fruits 0.86
be better than healthy food 0.85
is food 0.80
is less expensive 0.80
be cheap 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food, is food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, is food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, is less expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(junk food, is food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheap)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheap)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheap)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)