fast food: be cheap compared to cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap compared to cooking 1.00
be cheap compared to cooking at home 0.97
is cheap 0.82
be cheaper than healthy food 0.80
be cheaper than food 0.80
is inexpensive 0.78
be cheaper than vegetables 0.77
be better than home cooked 0.77
is cheaper 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is cheap)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pizza, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pizza, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, be better than home cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)