fast food: be cheap compared to cooking at home

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap compared to cooking at home 1.00
be cheap compared to cooking 0.97
be better than home cooked 0.83
be cheaper than healthy food 0.81
is cheap 0.80
be cheaper than food 0.80
be cheaper than vegetables 0.78
be better than home 0.77
is inexpensive 0.76
is cheaper 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is cheap)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(junk food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pizza, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pizza, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheap)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fast food, is cheaper)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be cheap compared to cooking at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)