beef: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
be expensive in us 0.86
is expensive right now 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
is suddenly expensive 0.85
be expensive in states 0.84
be more expensive in general 0.82
is fucking expensive 0.81
be more expensive than plant food 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dairy product, is suddenly expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dark meat, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is suddenly expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is suddenly expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dairy product, is suddenly expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dark meat, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ground beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(beef, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(beef, is more expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dairy product, is suddenly expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ground beef, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ground beef, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dairy product, is suddenly expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(beef, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)