lunch meat: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.80
, food
Weight: 0.66
, item
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.55
, stuff
Weight: 0.52
Siblings salami
Weight: 0.61
, meat pie
Weight: 0.40
, hamburger
Weight: 0.39
, chicken
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stuff, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(salami, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(salami, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(salami, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(salami, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)