meat: be more expensive than plant food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than plant food 1.00
be more expensive than meat 0.87
be more expensive than vegetables 0.86
be more expensive than dark meat 0.84
be more dangerous than vegetables 0.81
be more dangerous than raw vegetables 0.81
be better than vegetables 0.79
be tastier than vegetables 0.78
be better than chicken 0.77
be more filling than vegetables 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meat, be better than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(meat, be more filling than vegetables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(meat, be more filling than vegetables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more filling than vegetables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(meat, be more filling than vegetables)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)