meat: be better than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chicken 1.00
taste like chicken 0.87
be more expensive than meat 0.85
be better than vegetables 0.83
be harder than other meats 0.83
be more expensive than dark meat 0.82
be harder than meats 0.82
be tastier than vegetables 0.82
have meat 0.81
be expensive in turkey 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meat, be better than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(meat, taste like chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, taste like chicken)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(meat, taste like chicken)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(meat, be expensive in turkey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be tastier than vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, taste like chicken)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive in turkey)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meat, be better than vegetables)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(meat, be tastier than vegetables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)