chicken: have meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have meat 1.00
be in meat 0.99
is meat 0.99
be called meat 0.97
have white meat 0.95
be considered meat 0.94
have black meat 0.94
have light meat 0.94
is white meat 0.94
is red meat 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chicken, have meat)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chicken, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, is meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chicken, be called meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, is red meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chicken, be considered meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chicken, be considered meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chicken, be considered meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicken, is red meat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called meat)