chicken: is meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is meat 1.00
be in meat 0.99
have meat 0.99
be called meat 0.97
be considered meat 0.95
is white meat 0.94
is red meat 0.94
have white meat 0.93
have black meat 0.93
have light meat 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, is meat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chicken, have meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chicken, be called meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, is red meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chicken, be considered meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chicken, be considered meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chicken, be considered meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicken, is red meat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called meat)