chicken: is red meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red meat 1.00
is white meat 0.95
have white meat 0.94
is meat 0.94
be in meat 0.94
be better than red meat 0.94
have black meat 0.93
have meat 0.93
be called meat 0.93
have light meat 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, is red meat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chicken, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, is meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called meat)