chicken: be better than red meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than red meat 1.00
be worse than red meat 0.97
be better than meat 0.96
is red meat 0.94
be worse than meat 0.93
have white meat 0.91
is white meat 0.90
have black meat 0.90
be in meat 0.90
have meat 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than red meat)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chicken, have meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, is red meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicken, is red meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than red meat)