chicken: be better than meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than meat 1.00
be better than red meat 0.96
be worse than meat 0.95
be worse than red meat 0.93
be in meat 0.92
have meat 0.92
be better than beef 0.92
be better than chicken 0.91
is meat 0.91
be called meat 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than meat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chicken, have meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chicken, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chicken, be called meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chicken, be worse than red meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicken, be worse than red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called meat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chicken, be better than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)