chicken: be called meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called meat 1.00
is meat 0.97
be in meat 0.97
have meat 0.97
be considered meat 0.95
is white meat 0.93
be called dark meat 0.93
is red meat 0.93
have white meat 0.92
have light meat 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, be called dark meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dark meat, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dark meat, be called dark meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(dark meat, be called dark meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chicken, be called meat)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chicken, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chicken, is meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chicken, have meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, is red meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chicken, be considered meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chicken, be considered meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chicken, be considered meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicken, is red meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be considered meat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called meat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dark meat, be called dark meat)