beef: have meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have meat 1.00
have red meat 0.94
be considered meat 0.94
eat raw than pork 0.87
be called beef 0.85
be better than pork 0.85
be called mongolian beef 0.85
be healthier than pork 0.83
be more expensive than pork 0.82
be better than chicken 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, be called beef)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(meat, have red meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be considered meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pork, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pork, be considered meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beef, have meat)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beef, have red meat)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be called beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beef, be called mongolian beef)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than pork)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be called beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beef, be considered meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beef, be considered meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beef, be called beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beef, be called beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(beef, be better than pork)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(beef, have red meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than pork)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(beef, be better than pork)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beef, be called mongolian beef)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(beef, have red meat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(beef, be called mongolian beef)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beef, have red meat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beef, be called mongolian beef)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be called beef)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pork, be considered meat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be called beef)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat)