meat: have red meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red meat 1.00
have meat 0.94
be called meat 0.92
be called dark meat 0.90
be more expensive than dark meat 0.86
be more expensive than meat 0.84
is things shaped like meat 0.83
is free things shaped like meat 0.81
be harder than meats 0.81
be harder than other meats 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beef, have red meat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(beef, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(beef, have red meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lamb, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lamb, be called meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(meat, have red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lamb, be called meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beef, have red meat)