beef: be considered meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered meat 1.00
have meat 0.94
have red meat 0.90
eat raw than pork 0.84
be called beef 0.84
be considered most unsustainable meat 0.84
be considered unsustainable meat 0.83
be called mongolian beef 0.83
be better than pork 0.82
be more expensive than pork 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, be called beef)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(meat, have red meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be considered meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(meat, have red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beef, be considered meat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beef, be considered meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pork, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pork, be considered meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beef, be considered meat)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beef, have red meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be called beef)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beef, be called mongolian beef)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be called beef)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pork, be considered meat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be called beef)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat)