meat: be called beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called beef 1.00
be called meat 0.88
have meat 0.85
be called dark meat 0.81
have red meat 0.80
compare to meats 0.78
be more expensive than meat 0.77
compare to other meats 0.77
be better than chicken 0.76
taste like chicken 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beef, have red meat)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be called beef)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beef, be called beef)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lamb, be called meat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(beef, have red meat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(beef, have red meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(meat, be called beef)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(meat, taste like chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meat, have red meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, taste like chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meat, be better than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(meat, taste like chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(meat, have red meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, taste like chicken)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(meat, have red meat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(meat, have red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be called beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be called beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lamb, be called meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(meat, be called beef)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beef, have red meat)