lamb: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.71
, dish
Weight: 0.68
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ewe
Weight: 0.46
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, beef
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
be more expensive than meat 0.79
be more expensive than other meat 0.79
be more expensive than beef 0.76
be expensive compared to meat 0.76
be expensive compared to other meat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(lamb, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)