lamb: be more expensive than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.71
, dish
Weight: 0.68
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ewe
Weight: 0.46
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, beef
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than beef 1.00
be better than beef 0.95
be more expensive than meat 0.94
be more expensive than other meat 0.93
be healthier than beef 0.91
be expensive compared to meat 0.87
be expensive compared to other meat 0.86
is more expensive 0.83
be worse than pork 0.83
be more expensive than mutton 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pork, be better than beef)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(pork, be better than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pork, be better than beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pork, be better than beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)