lamb: be worse than pork

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.71
, dish
Weight: 0.68
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ewe
Weight: 0.46
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, beef
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than pork 1.00
be better than beef 0.85
be more expensive than meat 0.85
be more expensive than other meat 0.84
be more expensive than beef 0.83
be expensive compared to other meat 0.82
be expensive compared to meat 0.81
be healthier than beef 0.81
be called meat 0.81
be more expensive than mutton 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pork, be better than beef)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(pork, be better than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pork, be better than beef)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pork, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pork, be called meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pork, be healthier than beef)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lamb, be worse than pork)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lamb, be called meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lamb, be called meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lamb, be better than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lamb, be better than beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lamb, be better than beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lamb, be called meat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lamb, be worse than pork)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pork, be called meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pork, be better than beef)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, be healthier than beef)