lamb: be more expensive than mutton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.71
, dish
Weight: 0.68
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ewe
Weight: 0.46
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, beef
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than mutton 1.00
be more common than mutton 0.97
be more expensive than meat 0.86
be more expensive than other meat 0.85
be expensive compared to meat 0.82
be more expensive than beef 0.82
be expensive compared to other meat 0.82
be worse than pork 0.78
be called lamb 0.78
be better than beef 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pork, be better than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(pork, be better than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pork, be better than beef)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lamb, be called lamb)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(lamb, be called lamb)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lamb, be better than beef)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lamb, be better than beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lamb, be better than beef)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lamb, be called lamb)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be called lamb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than mutton)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than mutton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pork, be better than beef)