amputation: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.69
, complication
Weight: 0.67
, condition
Weight: 0.65
, operation
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.59
Siblings plastic surgery
Weight: 0.37
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.37
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.36
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.36
, surgery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
work in age 0.77
work in 13th age 0.77
acting work 0.77
acting exactly work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(condition, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(operation, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(condition, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(method, acting work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(method, acting exactly work)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(condition, work in 13th age)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condition, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(method, acting work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(surgery, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(condition, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(amputation, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(amputation, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(amputation, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(amputation, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(amputation, work)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(surgery, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(surgery, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(amputation, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amputation, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(operation, work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(method, acting work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condition, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(surgery, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(operation, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(method, acting work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condition, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(amputation, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)
...