animation: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
be created 0.96
be created today 0.91
was developed 0.83
was invented 0.79
was cancelled 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shrek, was cancelled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photography, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cinema, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(photography, was created)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(photography, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shrek, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shrek, was cancelled)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photography, was developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cinema, was invented)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cinema, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(animation, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(animation, be created)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(animation, be created)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animation, be created today)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(animation, be created today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(animation, be created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(animation, be created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(animation, be created today)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(animation, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(animation, was invented)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animation, be created today)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(animation, was invented)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(animation, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(animation, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shrek, was cancelled)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, was developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(photography, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animation, was created)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cinema, was invented)