aphid: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.58
, habitat
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, garden
Weight: 0.49
Siblings beetle
Weight: 0.38
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, moth
Weight: 0.37
, termite
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(insect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(garden, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(garden, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(garden, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(insect, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(insect, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(insect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(aphid, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(aphid, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(aphid, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(aphid, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(garden, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(aphid, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aphid, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aphid, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(aphid, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aphid, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(garden, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(insect, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(garden, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aphid, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(insect, has quality good)