garden: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable garden
Weight: 0.78
, site
Weight: 0.63
, habitat
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.59
, setting
Weight: 0.58
Siblings honey
Weight: 0.61
, aphid
Weight: 0.49
, gardening
Weight: 0.36
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, park
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality system 0.84
be good for environment 0.80
is good choice 0.78
be good for community 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vegetable garden, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vegetable garden, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(vegetable garden, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(honey, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gardening, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(garden, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(garden, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vegetable garden, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(garden, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(gardening, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gardening, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(honey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(honey, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(aphid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(garden, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(garden, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(garden, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(garden, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(garden, has quality system)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garden, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vegetable garden, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gardening, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(honey, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality good)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garden, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vegetable garden, be good for environment)