park: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
is quality 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
has quality shit 0.79
has quality services 0.77
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(property, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(property, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(property, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(property, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(location, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(playground, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(playground, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(property, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(property, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(location, has quality services)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(playground, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(property, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality wrong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playground, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(property, has quality right)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(property, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality services)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(property, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(property, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(property, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(park, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(property, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playground, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(playground, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(property, has quality right)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(property, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, has quality services)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(property, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playground, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(playground, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(property, has quality right)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(property, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, has quality services)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)