appendicitis: has state problem

Related concepts

Parents	illness Weight: 0.66 , condition Weight: 0.65 , pelvic inflammatory disease Weight: 0.64 , inflammation Weight: 0.63 , cause Weight: 0.60
Siblings	gastroenteritis Weight: 0.37 , pneumonia Weight: 0.37 , bronchitis Weight: 0.37 , typhoid fever Weight: 0.36 , sinusitis Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state problem	1.00
is social problem	0.85
be social problem	0.85
is growing problem	0.84
has state concern	0.84
is issue	0.78
has state disorder	0.76
has state condition	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(inflammation, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(illness, is growing problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(illness, be social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(illness, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(inflammation, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(illness, is social problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(illness, be social problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(illness, is growing problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(illness, be social problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(illness, is social problem)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state problem)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(illness, is growing problem)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(sinusitis, has state problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(gastroenteritis, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(inflammation, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(illness, be social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(illness, is growing problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(illness, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(gastroenteritis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(gastroenteritis, has state problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(sinusitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(sinusitis, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(appendicitis, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(appendicitis, is issue)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(appendicitis, is issue)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(appendicitis, is issue)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(appendicitis, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(illness, is growing problem)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(illness, is social problem)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(inflammation, has state concern)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(illness, be social problem)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(inflammation, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(gastroenteritis, has state problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(sinusitis, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(inflammation, has state problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(illness, is social problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(illness, is growing problem)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(illness, be social problem)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(appendicitis, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(inflammation, has state concern)