appraisal: is essential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.65
, property
Weight: 0.62
, evaluation
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, cost
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, condo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is essential 1.00
is necessary 0.83
be important in organisation 0.82
be essential at phase of project 0.77
is useful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(evaluation, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is useful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(evaluation, is useful)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is essential)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(appraisal, is essential)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(appraisal, is necessary)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(appraisal, be important in organisation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in organisation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(appraisal, be important in organisation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(appraisal, be important in organisation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(evaluation, is necessary)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(evaluation, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(evaluation, is necessary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(evaluation, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)