arb: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medication
Weight: 0.42
, agent
Weight: 0.41
, brand
Weight: 0.39
, board
Weight: 0.38
, locker
Weight: 0.36
Siblings premium
Weight: 0.28
, biological agent
Weight: 0.28
, naproxen
Weight: 0.28
, paxil
Weight: 0.28
, acetaminophen
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
is quality problems 0.80
is new good 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
have suck bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(agent, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(locker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(locker, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medication, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(medication, is quality problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(locker, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(locker, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(board, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(agent, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medication, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(medication, is quality problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(locker, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(agent, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(locker, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(board, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medication, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(medication, is quality problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(premium, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(premium, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acetaminophen, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(paxil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(naproxen, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(locker, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(agent, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(locker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medication, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(medication, is quality problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(premium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(premium, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(naproxen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(naproxen, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(paxil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(paxil, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(acetaminophen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(acetaminophen, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(premium, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(premium, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(premium, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(premium, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(premium, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arb, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(arb, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(arb, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(arb, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(locker, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(locker, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(medication, is quality problems)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(agent, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(medication, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(premium, is quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(premium, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(premium, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(premium, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(naproxen, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(paxil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(acetaminophen, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(locker, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(locker, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(agent, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(medication, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(arb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(medication, is quality problems)