arb: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medication
Weight: 0.42
, agent
Weight: 0.41
, brand
Weight: 0.39
, board
Weight: 0.38
, locker
Weight: 0.36
Siblings premium
Weight: 0.28
, biological agent
Weight: 0.28
, naproxen
Weight: 0.28
, paxil
Weight: 0.28
, acetaminophen
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality worth 0.85
is new good 0.83
is quality problems 0.79
be good for school 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(agent, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(locker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medication, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(locker, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(locker, be good for school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(medication, is quality problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(locker, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(board, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(agent, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(locker, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medication, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(medication, is quality problems)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(locker, be good for school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(locker, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(agent, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(locker, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(locker, be good for school)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(board, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medication, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(medication, is quality problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(premium, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(acetaminophen, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(paxil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(naproxen, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(agent, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(locker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(locker, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medication, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(medication, is quality problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(locker, be good for school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(premium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(premium, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(naproxen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(naproxen, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(paxil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(paxil, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(premium, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(acetaminophen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(acetaminophen, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(premium, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(premium, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(arb, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arb, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arb, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(arb, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(arb, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arb, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(arb, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(locker, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(medication, is quality problems)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(medication, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(locker, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(agent, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(locker, be good for school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(premium, is quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(premium, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(premium, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(naproxen, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(paxil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(acetaminophen, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(locker, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(agent, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(locker, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(medication, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(medication, is quality problems)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(arb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(locker, be good for school)