asia: is more populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents continent
Weight: 0.63
, europe
Weight: 0.62
, world
Weight: 0.58
, region
Weight: 0.58
, country
Weight: 0.58
Siblings north america
Weight: 0.67
, japan
Weight: 0.65
, american samoa
Weight: 0.64
, east asia
Weight: 0.59
, ottoman empire
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more populated 1.00
is populated 0.97
is highly populated 0.90
is densely populated 0.87
is most populous region 0.77
have most population 0.76
be more populous than europe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(europe, is populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(asia, is more populated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(asia, is more populated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(asia, is more populated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(region, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(asia, is more populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(region, is populated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(europe, is populated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(region, is densely populated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(europe, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(europe, is populated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(europe, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(east asia, is densely populated)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(east asia, is populated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, is densely populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(europe, is populated)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(asia, is more populated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(asia, is more populated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(asia, is more populated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(region, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(asia, is more populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(east asia, is populated)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(east asia, is populated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(japan, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(japan, is densely populated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(east asia, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(east asia, is densely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(asia, is more populated)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(asia, is populated)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(asia, is populated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(asia, is populated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(asia, is densely populated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(asia, is populated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(asia, is densely populated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(asia, is densely populated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(asia, is densely populated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(asia, have most population)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(asia, have most population)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(asia, have most population)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(asia, have most population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(asia, is more populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(europe, is populated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(region, is densely populated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(europe, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(east asia, is populated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(east asia, is densely populated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(japan, is densely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(europe, is populated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(region, is densely populated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(asia, is more populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(europe, is densely populated)