assault: is pre existing condition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pre existing condition 1.00
is existing condition 0.95
is pre condition 0.94
is existing 0.84
has state condition 0.83
is pre 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre condition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sexual assault, is existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(assault, is pre existing condition)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(assault, is existing condition)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, is pre condition)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(assault, is pre condition)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(assault, is pre condition)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(assault, is existing condition)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(assault, is pre existing condition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)