asset: be to liabilities

Related concepts

Parents	loan Weight: 0.68 , option Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.60 , customer Weight: 0.59
Siblings	experience Weight: 0.64 , talent Weight: 0.64 , good will Weight: 0.57 , domain Weight: 0.55 , farmland Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be to liabilities	1.00
have liabilities	1.00
be equal to liabilities	0.94
differ from liabilities	0.93
differ from current liabilities	0.91
be considered assets	0.78
has quality assets	0.78
be listed before assets	0.77
assets to banks	0.76
have for banks assets	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(asset, be to liabilities)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(loan, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(asset, be to liabilities)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(loan, have for banks assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(asset, be to liabilities)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(loan, be considered assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(asset, be to liabilities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(loan, has quality assets)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(loan, assets to banks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality assets)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(loan, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(asset, be to liabilities)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(loan, be considered assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(asset, be to liabilities)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(loan, assets to banks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(asset, be to liabilities)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(loan, have for banks assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(asset, be to liabilities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(asset, be to liabilities)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(asset, have liabilities)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(asset, have liabilities)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(asset, be equal to liabilities)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(asset, have liabilities)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(asset, have liabilities)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, differ from liabilities)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(asset, differ from liabilities)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(asset, differ from current liabilities)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(asset, differ from liabilities)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(asset, differ from liabilities)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(asset, be equal to liabilities)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed before assets)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(asset, differ from current liabilities)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(asset, be equal to liabilities)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(asset, differ from current liabilities)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(asset, be listed before assets)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(asset, differ from current liabilities)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(asset, be equal to liabilities)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(asset, be listed before assets)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(asset, be listed before assets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(asset, be to liabilities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(loan, has quality assets)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(loan, has quality assets)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(asset, be to liabilities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)