loan: have for banks assets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt
Weight: 0.63
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings credit
Weight: 0.69
, asset
Weight: 0.68
, mortgage
Weight: 0.65
, contract
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
have for banks assets 1.00
assets to banks 0.99
be considered assets to banks 0.98
be important to banks 0.89
be considered assets 0.88
has quality assets 0.88
be more liquid than assets 0.85
be more liquid than real assets 0.84
decrease assets 0.83
be viewed as assets 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than real assets)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(credit, decrease assets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than assets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than assets)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(asset, be more liquid than assets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(credit, decrease assets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(credit, decrease assets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(facility, be viewed as assets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than real assets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(asset, be more liquid than real assets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(loan, have for banks assets)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality assets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(loan, has quality assets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(loan, assets to banks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality assets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(loan, has quality assets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, assets to banks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(loan, be important to banks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loan, be important to banks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(credit, decrease assets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(asset, be more liquid than assets)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(asset, be more liquid than real assets)