loan: be considered assets to banks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt
Weight: 0.63
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings credit
Weight: 0.69
, asset
Weight: 0.68
, mortgage
Weight: 0.65
, contract
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered assets to banks 1.00
have for banks assets 0.98
assets to banks 0.98
be considered assets 0.92
be important to banks 0.88
be viewed as assets 0.87
has quality assets 0.87
be listed before assets 0.85
be more liquid than assets 0.85
be listed before fixed assets 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed before fixed assets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed before assets)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than assets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(facility, be viewed as assets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(asset, be more liquid than assets)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(asset, be more liquid than assets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(asset, be listed before assets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed before assets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(asset, be listed before fixed assets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed before fixed assets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(loan, assets to banks)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to banks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality assets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(loan, have for banks assets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(loan, has quality assets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(loan, be considered assets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(loan, assets to banks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality assets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(loan, has quality assets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, assets to banks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(loan, be important to banks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loan, assets to banks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loan, be important to banks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loan, be important to banks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(facility, be viewed as assets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(asset, be more liquid than assets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(asset, be listed before assets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(asset, be listed before fixed assets)